Plant based diet and the environment

By | July 11, 2020

plant based diet and the environment

As we approach Earth Day this upcoming April 22nd, I am reminded of the environmental benefits of a plant-based diet. Advocates of a plant-based diet have long been aware that what we choose to eat is one of the most significant factors in the personal impact we have on the environment. The United Nations builds on this understanding to make a more explicit statement about the need for a vegetarian diet. Noting that there are 7 billion people to feed on the planet today and an estimated 2 billion more are expected by , they demonstrate that most of the water we consume as a society is used to produce our food. In educational materials designed to reach as many people as possible, they point out over and over again that meat products are tens and sometimes hundreds of times more water intensive to produce than plant foods. More than half of the water used in the United States today is for animal agriculture. One stark example of overexploitation is the Ogallala Aquifer, an underground body of water stretching from the Dakotas to Texas that feeds intensive irrigation throughout the Great Plains. The spill killed about 10 million fish and closed , acres of coastal wetlands. One might hope this was an isolated incident.

Finally, only participants living in mainland France and having complete data to calculate the nutritional quality scores were included. One Pot Meals. Vegetarian and vegan diets would result in even lower greenhouse gas emissions, but a flexitarian diet “is the least stringent that is both healthy and the reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough for plant to stay within environmental limits,” according to Springmann. Beefless Thursdays are offered at thr main dining halls throughout campus to highlight the negative environmental impacts associated with beef based. Public The Nutr 5 4 — Diet Change—a solution to reduce water use? Ekahi And. The monthly income diet household unit was obtained based dividing monthly income by consumption environment CU ; the first adult in the household diet 1 CU, other persons older than 14 environment 0.

Something Thanks based environment the diet plant and that interrupt

As cities grow and incomes rise around the world, more and more people are leaving gardens and traditional diets behind and eating refined sugars, refined fats, oils and resource- and land-intense agricultural products like beef. This global dietary transition is harming the health of both people and the planet, says new research. But the study also shows that shifting away from this trajectory and choosing healthier traditional Mediterranean, pescatarian or vegetarian diets could not only boost human lifespans and quality of life, but also slash emissions and save habitat for endangered species. And we better hurry; the scientists project that if the trend continues, the situation will be worse yet with greenhouse gas emissions up by 80 percent by David Tilman and graduate student Michael Clark illustrate how current diet trends are contributing to ever-rising agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and habitat degradation. When the researchers combined the trends with forecasts of population growth and income growth for the coming decades, they were able to project that diets in will contain fewer servings of fruits and vegetables, about 60 percent more empty calories and 25 to 50 percent more pork, poultry, beef, dairy and eggs. These are changes that are known to increase the prevalence of type II diabetes, coronary heart disease and some cancers. Using life-cycle analyses of various food production systems, the study also calculated that, if current trends prevail, these diets would also lead to an 80 percent increase in global greenhouse gas emissions from food production as well as habitat destruction due to land clearing for agriculture around the world. In addition, this dietary shift would prevent the destruction of an area of tropical forests and savannahs as large as half of the United States.

Leave a Reply